Save Wonder Woman!!!

ww1This is actually the impetus for the whole site. It’s a labor of love, with many angles and some strong emotions for me, personally. I’ve loved the titular character of this blog from before kindergarden. I’ve followed her on a monthly basis for almost 40 years. I’ve waited breathlessly for her show to debut, and each episode thereafter. I’ve anxiously awaited any portrayal of her in any media, to some excitement and lots of disappointment. I’ve bought toys galore. I’ve spent good money over bad for my fix, even when I really didn’t have the capital to do so. In recent years, it has become a major frustration for me, and I’ve analyzed why to the Nth degree, and this is my dissection, observation, and potential solutions. I hope you enjoy.

1st ww

A TARGET OF MUCH DISCUSSION

   I’ve taken to scanning a lot of comments about Wonder Woman lately. They are as varied as those about sports teams. Some I’m with, many I’m not. Here’s a sampling, with my responses that I’ll fortify later:  “Comic fans are sexist, and won’t give her a chance.” Nope, not buying it. For one, I run a fan group page, and there’s so much love for her it’s astounding. Second, when DC announced the coming of the New 52, without a doubt I can say that fan excitement over Wonder Woman’s new title was through the roof. It was everywhere about Brian Azzarello and Cliff Chiang’s forthcoming take. Third, check out the internet and see how many articles/sites/groups there are about her. As the song says “All The World Is Waiting For You…”. I don’t blame fans, I blame creators. PERIOD. Also, in regards to sexism, Marvel has Captain Marvel, drawing in new fans, a large portion of which are female. “They should take her back to Perez era, and make her an ambassador for peace”. Not with you there, either. More later, but in a nutshell, Perez told his story sum and full. Totally. It wouldn’t be honoring the intent of the character, it would be back-peddling. As stated, MUCH more to follow. “I don’t know this character anymore.” Bingo! No one does, and again, it falls to Creative. This character is so blurry at this point, there’s no consensus. She’s been failed and revamped to no avail repeatedly. Every creator tries to undo the previous one and make it something new, and for some reason she winds up in the same pigeon-hole with even more inconsistencies and loosening of definition and purpose than before. The wheel has been recreated with stunning pace. Most galling is, like most characters, if you just go to the start to find the intention, see how it got lost, and then see how to bring it home again, it’s all right there. Let’s start from the start.

ww1

THE GOOD DOCTOR AND WOMEN

Charles Moulton, nee Dr. William Moulton Marston, is largely known for his sexual proclivities. Let’s get them out of the way first, if we must. He was into the bondage thing, and it showed in his stories. No argument. He had multiple wives and partners under the same roof. The same, and done. OK, now we can look at the rest. He believed in a principle of womanhood that involved matriarchy, with a fulfillment therein. The belief was that women were the only people who could save the world. Man would have to surrender totally, then women could undo their bellicose ways and make peace. Simple. It would take submission for us to get there, but then we could move toward Utopia. Paradise Island, it’s inhabitants, and Diana were borne of his logic. The island was not just a retreat for a weary bunch of women, it was a god(s) given place, where the Amazons were expected by their deities to make magic. Over centuries, these immortal gals created an atmosphere of magic, joy, love, as well as advancements in science and medicine. They were way ahead of our curve on every level. It’s this arena that was the groundwork for who Diana would be. The first incarnation of the character had an arsenal of tech. The invisible jet, a ‘mental radio’, earrings that allowed her to speak and interpret other tongues (and in some cases breathe underwater), and a lasso of pure godly magic. She was totally tricked out. The strength, speed, agility, and such were there, but they weren’t the sole source of her power by a long-shot. She was strong enough to pick up the back-end of a car to stop it from moving, but she couldn’t pick it up over her head and throw it or some-such. No flying or the like, either. Her mission, set in play by Col. Trevor’s plane crash and need for a lift home, was to be a freedom-fighting ambassador to the world. The first emissary from the race that could, and probably would, one day save us all from ourselves. One of the major ways she outdid her peers in this shade was how she handled her totally female population of foes. Upon apprehension, she would bring them to an island her “sisters” set up for her called Reform Island, where the anti-social were to be rehabbed. It was often successful. Paula Von Gunther, an Axis agent close to Hitler, ended up there and became a vital part of the Amazon science community and stayed in continuity way past the Golden Age model; the Cheetah got a new lease on life too, as did others. This was a marvelous component for showing Di as the great reformer and not just a generic crime-fighter. She got results as a social justice wunderkind. What ended up happening was the retirement of the good Doc from the book, and then the issue that was her Achilles heel from day one became the focus for years: her strange over-the-top borderline obsessive love for Steve Trevor. Her title morphed overnight into a romance book, then a pale silly imitation, a karate driven espionage book, a tv show adaptation, ending as a dark looking book with a cypher lead. Then, a cosmic Crisis with our heroine turned back to the clay she came from, the end. Next, George Perez.

perez ww

GEORGE PEREZ: CREATOR, OR DESTROYER?

After the Crisis, Diana was a blank canvas ready for a new palette. The hottest artist in the DC camp, George Perez, was tapped to draw with industry vet Len Wein behind the keyboard. They attacked it with great aplomb. What they engineered was a truly cinematic take on the lady. It was not a superhero book anymore. It had a sense of identity that set it apart from the other titles, literally and figuratively. Other characters from the DCU were barely given notice nor presence. Paradise Island was now Themiscyra, keeping it with the Greek. Amazon science was now absent. Steve Trevor was a older man, who’s connection was a strange one in regards to Diana. His mom had crash landed on the Isle back in the ’40s and saved an Amazon from a monster that crawled out of the basement of the venue, where all evil mythological creatures were kept with the women in charge of their incarceration as punishment for falling to the evil ways of man and getting themselves enslaved. Diana Trevor lost her life and became the person WW was named after. The mission was back to Ambassador, and again, not super-heroine, not one bit. Rather than Washington, DC, Diana was mystically transported with Steve (no Invisible Jet this time) to Boston, where she took up residence with a scholar of Greek History, Julia Kappetelis, and her teen daughter Vanessa. In less than 10 issues, Mr. Perez became the double-duty man on the book with Wein’s exit. It was very blatantly a feminist statement. Standards of beauty, notions of the nature of feminine culture, even MENOPAUSE were topics in the title. Fans loved it, because it was so fresh and daring. Diana wouldn’t fight anyone without appealing to reason first, which I myself loved. His run lasted 62 issues, and he was joined by co-writer Mindy Newell 2/3 of the way through, and dropped the art chores around the same time and handed them to Chris Merrinan. The hindsight here, is that again, the book was more like a movie than most comics at the time. It was very real world despite it’s gods, monsters, villains, and fictional elements. Also, like a good movie, it had a beginning, a middle (I’d qualify the arc where ambassadors from “Patriarch’s World” came to Themiscryra and were terrorized by Eris, the goddess of strife as the median), and an end- where Diana shuts down the  Wonder Woman Foundation she established, and flies off into the sunset with a full tote bag. Story told, done and done.

 

byrne

JOHN BYRNE TRIES TO SET IT RIGHT, AND NEARLY DOES

John Byrne came in on a mission. A few words about the man: he’s a one-man band. He does it all, the writing, the drawing, even the lettering in some cases. He’s a clean-up guy. He comes onto a book, and mostly ignores what came before, sticking to core content and putting it back to it’s elements and bringing back what’s classical and outstanding. His downside? He’s pretty “meh” as an actual script writer. I find that his dialogue is pretty lame, as a rule, and he takes fairly contrived and clunky means to get things back on their shelves. That said, he does get ultimate results. Here’s the laundry list:

Gateway City– She needed a home of her own since the get-go. Moulton wasn’t aware of her peer circumstances when he opted for D.C. as the locale. Gateway was a great analogy for San Francisco, which fits like a glove. It gives her distance from the obvious New York refs that Metropolis and Gotham are AND as a metaphor, SF would be a great environment for her with it’s liberal, free-spirited demeanor. This is crucial to her Trinity presence, shared with Batman and Superman.

Invisible Jet– He gave it plausibility. A gift from aliens, that can become the vehicle of her choosing. Also, it folds up into a little see-through pendant, so no obvious parking limitations. If the move were ever made to Amazon tech, the alien origin would be unnecessary.

Wonder Girl– Every good hero needs partners, and a camp. Cassie Sandsmark was a blast, she was fun, feisty, and age-appropriate. Donna Troy had become lost after the Crisis, and needed her WW connection. The route to her destination was needlessly busy, but he added her to the ‘family’ Wonder Woman team, and gave her back her role in the DCU.

A Place Among the Heroes– Darkseid was a great foil for her. His despising of her pointed out her peaceful, love-filled truth, and showed her as a force as potent as Superman. Having her up against pre-established DC villains like Morgan LeFey and Doomsday put her firmly in the Universe.

World War 2– Wonder Woman is a WW2 icon more than her peers. Her appearance and her activities against the Nazis at the time make it so. In the new DCU it’s irrelevant, but the intent was cool and the Justice Society needed her at their table. Again, the super-heroine in full effect.

pj1

PHIL JIMINEZ, THE LAST TRADITIONALIST

Phil, IMO, might have been the truest lover of Di’s. He took the whole mythology and tried to synch it together, with a lot of good results. Like Byrne, his contributions were discarded upon his exit from the book. I will concede that the last quarter was a tad self-indulgent with the story-line with every female DC character used in one issue, and the time trip with Villainy, Inc, the most stupidly titled enclave ever. Still, he tried to make the character linear, and came closer to a cohesive working version than any other bothered to attempt.

Paradise Found– He finally got Themiscyra back to being Paradise Island. It was a bumpy road, but the floating nation, with it’s magical violence clamp-down was amazing. The Oz-like enchantment factor drew ire from some camps who obviously didn’t know the roots. If they’d just given it time and showed how it would fit into the current mythos, they might well have grown to love it.

Sister Act– He took Byrne’s team ethic and ran with it. Many stories with the Wonder Girl, “Wonder Queen” and Troia posse present, and a dynamic therein that showcased each member. The roommate situation with Donna was great, and again, discarded without any reason or acknowledgement offered.

Back in the DC Game– The opening story with the Bat-Villains was obviously to draw in readers, but it was pretty damn good. It showcased both worlds and made them in the same Universe without crowding. Also, I loved the use of the Gods without them actually being physically present (more on that later).

rucka down to earth

GREG RUCKA- HERE WE GO AGAIN

Let me start by saying that Mr. Rucka is a DAMN good writer. He offered a Diana with a personality and scenario that was undoubtedly a matured sequel to Perez’s run. Many look at it as Diana’s finest hour, and if you read Perez and Rucka only, it’s pretty good, but as I’ll point out, it even contradicts his predecessor in grand fashion.

Where’d She Go?– Rucka’s run, sort of like Byrne’s, discards the in-betweens and attempts to tell a story that leaves a wide chasm of questions between his and the Post-Crisis genesis. Byrne, unlike Rucka, does acknowledge in cursory fashion what came before. Boston, her rift with the Amazons and her mother, and the Steve-Etta presence are part of his story. Rucka comes in with conceit. Where did that embassy come from? When did the Foundation HQ get built? Since when did she have a doorway to Themiscyra? No explanations given, and in the big picture that was needed.

The Foundation– As stated, his run was obviously a 5 or so year later extension of the GP era, which as also stated, ended with her dissolving the institution. She wanted to be an example in her autonomy, and didn’t want acolytes. Rucka’s story from the ground up was about an organization that had a closed door from early on, and again, with no explanation.

Who Are These People, and Where Did They Come From?– The Minotaur chef, Io the Amazon forger, and several other characters also spring from nowhere with no rhyme or reason.

Where Did Everybody Go?– No previous supporting cast at all. The Wonder Family, most notably.

amazons attack

WONDER WHEEL: DIANA IS THE HAMSTER

Now, here’s an inventory of the cyclical nature of the title. This is where the road from Perez, who wrapped it with a bow, leaving his writing descendants in the dark as to what to do with her lead:

Amazons at War– Perez brought in the Bana-Mighdall, and Messner-Loebs made them co-habitants with Hyppolyta’s tribe. WML’s arc made the group at large discordant and filled with drama. Byrne had Darkseid decimate the population. Luke had them fighting gods. Jiminez brought them to civil war, then decimated without a queen by Imperiex (ending on a rare positive note). Rucka smashed the new Island to pieces, then plopped them down on the shores of the Carolinas, and immediately attacked by their neighbors. The girls were pure militants at this point, unlike the way Jiminez left them. Amazons Attack was them versus our government, and later Gail Simone had a group of rebels bent on killing the royals.

Amazons Gone– Foisted to another dimension to create Diana Prince, Kung-Fu fighter even before Perez. Back to another plane by Messner-Loebs, off to limbo by Rucka. It happens again, to be seen shortly.

The Super-Villain Roller Coaster-Perez used some of them. Messner-Loebs neutered The Cheetah as a heavy, and focused on Circe. Byrne kept Cheetah as a victim not a villain, brought back Decay, and that’s it. Luke, no past villains from the canon, re-introducing Golden Aged Dr. Poison and creating Devastation (not used since). Jiminez used almost all of them. Rucka, none but a re-invigorated Cheetah. Heinburg brings them back as a group, leaves without establishing them. Picoult- none. Simone, even with the recent update and upgrade, it’s only Cheetah and Psycho without any of the more underused and exiting prospects like The Mask, Osira, Silver Swan, et al at her disposal. When you look at the JLA pantheon, rogues should be virtually omnipresent and explored.

Circe, the Leaning Post– Perez brought her in, and she’s an interesting foil. Messner-Loebs made her presence a background through most of his run. Jiminez made her the Big Bad. Heinberg made her the instigator, and the woman behind everything. Amazons Attack turned out to be all her doing. Circe is Wonder Woman’s Brainiac. She’s a big time threat to everyone, and should be used sparingly to keep her so. There’s no consistent Lex Luthor, and there needs to be. Someone consistently plotting and scheming who can’t be shrugged off. I vote for the Cheetah, whose staying power and presence in multi-media should make her be the one (for elaboration, see here).

Everybody’s a Damn “Visionary”– Perez, all from scratch. Messner-Loebs is cursed to find his own way. Byrne undoes WML. Luke discards Byrne. Jiminez drops Luke’s concepts. Simonson goes rogue. Rucka throws out everybody but Perez. Heinberg starts fresh. Simone changes the foundations. Picoult delivers the ultimate arrogance, and refuses to read any source material, because she’s so gifted and vision-driven, offering a disturbingly lukewarm take. All you get here is a muddied, contradicting book, with interpretations that do not jibe. By the time we got to the end, Hyppolyta, who was born an adult, who walked out of the ocean in the opening of Perez’s run, somehow had a grandmother at the end of the title, as a for instance.

Who IS this?– Back to the earlier complaint, no one knows. The last substantial origin story was in 1986. Batman: Year One is the same here, but Batman is an earth-level type. His story really doesn’t bear repeating, given it’s iconic status, and incorruptible mission statement. Fantastical characters need revision and semi-decade updates with ties to their present day interpretation. That’s why Superman gets that treatment, and his origin is easily as legendary as Bats’. Without this storytelling element, inconsistencies and contradictions abound.

The Warrior Path– Again, Perez unwittingly made it so, it wasn’t the impetus of the mission. By the Rucka end, she was re-imagined over and over as a sword and sorcery character, and not at all the peace-loving super-heroine. This is her disconnect in the Trinity and the League. The fantastical elements are vacant, and we have Lady Hercules in place. When in the group setting, she’s usually just a powerhouse combatant. Her intellect and know-how takes a backseat. She’s rarely seen in her company trying to be a peacemaker at all. The discarded pre-Crisis science-savvy lady fits the DCU much better, in my eyes, putting her in good company with Bats, as an alien from an advanced culture she fits with Superman, as the recipient of cultural arsenal, she’s there with Green Lantern. As a scientist, she should be beyond The Flash. The Universe is all about Science driven characters. Sword and sorcery doesn’t garner much of a choir- see: Warlord, and the cancelled Sword of Sorcery post New52 title.

new 52 headerknee pada

THE NEW 52-FILLED WITH HOPE AND DISAPPOINTMENT

I’d like to go back to the start of this treatise now. Remember when I talked about fan anticipation? I wasn’t kidding. It was everywhere, the love was there and practically on fire. This was fueled by the announcement of the creative team. I had literally thought repeatedly that if I had my pick, I would go with Cliff Chiang. I got my wish. For the first time in decades, DC did something I truly wanted with this character and I was ecstatic. Now, there’s writer Brian Azzarello, a noted and pedigreed scribe whose work is always creative and groundbreaking who got the community and myself hoping against hope for a brand new day for the character we are all just itching to love. That was not the case, at all, for me and a large body of readers. Not one bit. The story was not just the same, but in many ways worse.

Amazon Assholes Exponentially– Not three issues in, we learn that the tribe are hateful, savage, and dislike the main character. Hyppolyta is a coward, a liar, and is lust driven, throwing out her original wisdom and convictions. She’s a traitor to the deity she owed her life to. Further, as in a thousand miles so, the Amazons are raping thugs that do not value human life, slaughtering their sexual conquests and throwing their infants into the ocean to drown. Great statement about womanhood growing in autonomic circumstances here. BACK TO THE DARK AGES. AGAIN. 

About That Rape and Babies Jazz– Just what does Di know about reproduction? Apparently nothing at all. She was on an island with small children who had to grow up with her and packs of pregnant women, yet somehow didn’t piece anything together. A plot hole the size of the Grand Canyon. ABUSIVE TO INTENT, AND MYOPIC. AGAIN.

Amazons Gone– Also at it’s virtual inception as a title, we get the women turned into a feast of snakes, and the Queen is a statue. Poof. LAZY WRITING-AGAIN.

Hermes Is Just Hangin’, and the Rest– Perez already did this. Hermes came to Earth, hung with Di, was dissected to show the nature of godhood, and ended up dead. This brings up a bone with me about the Pantheon- what is faith? I’d say it’s believing in something you can’t prove. If you could pal around or sit and talk to God/Jesus/Mohammed, would that be faith? For me, it would not. As cast members, they are castrated. The presence should be felt and referenced, not seen. Furthermore, with intact Amazons, and a Man’s World cast, this makes three, then add on the JLA and such. Too scattering, and again, not really necessary. DONE BETTER BEFORE, AGAIN.

A New Cast That Eats the Title– A new character that’s vastly uninformed as such is immediately thrust into a circle. Zola is there before she is, and then the cast is mounting by the fourth issue. This book is not Wonder Woman, it’s a team book better called “God Force”. The nature of the new cast keeps her from developing and informing her present day surroundings and totally contradicts her outside appearances. WEAK. AGAIN.

Once More, Who Is This?– No origin telling. We are given nothing. She wakes up in London with no back-story. The Amazon mythos are not explored to explain the mission. JLA gives us the info that Steve Trevor was there, but she wasn’t into him, so why did she come and stick around? Just to get off that caustic island? Adrift and pointless once more. This was the chance to clean up a serious mess, and it was fumbled to a spectacular degree. Dan DiDio said he didn’t want to re-invent the wheel, and go back to established territory. What territory is THAT? The last offering, nigh-three decades ago bears no resemblance to this person. Diana’s peers get opposite treatment in this regard, and everyone acts like it’s a failing on the character’s part. Diane Nelson claims they just don’t know how to take such a jigsaw puzzle and adapt it to film. Here was your chance, you signed off on it, it’s all on you, lady, and your selected team. FAIL, AGAIN.

The Tradition Trampled– Along with the obscene and ghastly nature of the Amazons, we find out that Diana is Zeus’ bastard child. The clay thing was hokey in it’s inception. The Silver Age discarded it and gave her a dead dad who perished with all the other Amazon men in war. Gail Simone used the clay baby and got rid of the Golem-ish nature of the aspect with the spilling of the Queen’s blood to connect her as kin. Simple, and derides the disconnect inherent to the character. Moreover, Cassie Sandsmark was already done as his abandoned offspring, so this actually sort of reduces Di. Not to mention, now she’s literally Hercules-Woman. LAZY AGAIN.

A HORROR Book?– I’ll directly address the writer here. Who asked you for this, Brian? Seriously? If I want a horror book, I will buy one. I want a hero book like this one is supposed to be. Throwing a character like this into a different genre to avoid dealing with the subject at hand is lame. On top of that, I am OVER the Vertigo-izing of DC proper. I love(d) both, and want(ed) different things from each. This universe is too crowded as it is, and there’s little space being given to new and exciting prospects. I realize some of this is from a background in hard, edgy fare, but real Creatives can move to other genres and adapt. This is a creator adapting a character to them, so the comfort zone doesn’t get breeched. A few writers have done WW horror stories, and they were great. Changing the entire milieu of the character’s book to avoid stretching your wings is wretchedly weak. LAZY AGAIN AND AGAIN.

Another Damnable Visionary– Following the horrific example of Jodi Picoult, BA only got some cursory knowledge of the story and decided he knew what was best. Done with no examination (obviously) of what might be repetitious, or defeat the essence of the character. No one is so damned good that they can pick up an icon without scrutinizing and objectifying what came before. LAZY LAZY LAZY AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.

Cliff Chiang is a Pro, Yet No Control– Jim Lee created the horrific costume from the J. Michael Straczynski run, and it was loathed by the masses. For ridiculous numbers-driven reasons, he got to re-outfit a majority of the DCU, to gross effect (rant in full HERE). Busy, ugly suits abound. Naturally, he got to re-design WW’s dud of duds. A muted, washed out black, red, and silver number with unnecessary line-work. A functionless piece with an ornamental armband and choker set that repeats the chest emblem which now looks like so much bling. This was preceded by a signed-off look that involved black pants and friggin’ KNEE PADS. Cliff’s art is corrupted by it’s presence. His stuff is simple and elegant and he would’ve been a more than plausible designer for the look. Darwyn Cooke, in his legendary New Frontier, came up with a brilliant tweak of the original visual, and it was lauded greatly. Then dumped TWICE for a busy, excessive, and trendy Lee design. NOTHING LEARNED. AGAIN!

dodson

CAN THIS MESS BE FIXED, AND HOW?? THE ‘NO’ SIDE

Yes, it can, and no, it likely won’t. Won’t, because the damage is done. Maybe in 5 years, maybe in a decade, but not now. Decisions are being made by folks who do not care about and likely don’t even dig comics. All of the trickle-down from the Warner parent company has been part of a licensing plan for other ventures. It’s numbers on paper. They’re looking at bumps by Marvel, DC, and Image from the ’90s and deciding on what we comic readers want, with no knowledge of the fact that those that built it turned against it. I, for one, never wanted Vertigo to move into the DCU and bring the horror fringe. I loved both, separately but equally. I don’t want a damn Wonder Woman horror book, I want a book about a super-heroine, the grandmother of them all. Instead, I got a book I can’t stand to read anymore. I gave it several chances, too. I’ve tried her also in JLA, and it’s more been-there-done-that post 80’s drivel, where she’s a warrior who has no problem killing. She’s dating Superman now, too. Great. There goes autonomy and a sense of her own personal space in the DCU. It just seems to get worse.

allred ww

THE YES SIDE

Maybe, just maybe, the writing on the wall will make new things happen. That’s a reference to the fact the New 52 started with a bang, and is now just so-so in the overall comic sales mix. Maybe that (literal) Pandora’s Box will entrap the evil it unleashed (still sounds metaphoric, no?) and a new day will happen. Maybe an apology/amends with Nelson and whatever subordinate(s) that doesn’t get fired nodding to the fact that they did a rush job that ignored the wants and needs of their fans. Admitting too, that the ploy to gain new readership was done lousily. Warner Brothers is a BIG company, and if they really want this sector to become the post-Harry Potter tentpole, perhaps they could take a month’s loss and produce no books in the mainstream center, to allow time for some creativity to blossom. Then, return with a month of very inexpensive debuts, which would lose more on the upfront. I think that would be preferable to a bump followed by a downward spiral. Make a statement about fan love, dependence, and respect for material and they could actually achieve a win. Now, about the character at hand:

Origin Crucial– I think I’ve made my point here. I’m nodding to it again, just in case it hasn’t sunk in yet. You have to have a foundation if you want character success in any arena.

The ‘Bible”– This concept worked well for Batman for years. Make a book that is a composite, yet absolute treatise on WW. Origin notes, ideology and ethics code, situational reactions, powers and weapons set, general state of day-to-day affairs, casts, and all other relevancies should be there and be distributed to ALL DC editors and any writer who plans on using the character.

All-Star Superman: The Lessons of Grant Morrison– It is no secret the regard that the company, the fans, and the critics have for Grant. He’s earned it all, too. All-Star did the unthinkable. It took the most ludicrous aspects of the character and spun gold from them. It not only sold well, it got adapted to other media, increased love for the property with not a trace of disrespect for his relevant history, and has made scads of required comics-reading material lists as a genuine classic. Same but even more with Batman. 75 years of history umbrellaed in a little under a decade, with the silly made sublime. Awesome. Taking it and X-Men, you can see an expansion of the magic: he obviously thought of the end, worked backwards and came to the beginning. THAT’S what a visionary does. That’s how you take the old, make the new, and without corruption, deviation, or avoidance of what some would consider flaws. It is alchemy, and it is high art. Noteworthy too, is that in the last two mainstream endeavors, GM left the door open for his replacing writer. Unlike Perez who left the room with the lights off, Morrison left it open, kept the lights on, and gently escorted them into the room. He gave them a soft platform in a shiny new playroom, so they could add on whatever they liked and not stumble in the dark and trip on furniture. Wonder Woman, in other analogy, should be like Star Trek. You take the fantastical and make it a statement about the human condition. The root essence is about womanhood, love, and peace. This should be reflected in the content without having to be literal in the message. She shouldn’t be fighting terrorists, she should be fighting menaces that imply terrorism. The metaphorical approach is also high art. Art is what we want, and it’s what keeps us coming. It challenges us, and keeps us engaged. Fads pass quickly, fashion is eternal. Art is fashion. This is probably the most important message I can deliver. If you happen to be from Creative, read again until you eat, sleep, and breathe it. SIDENOTE: Morrison’s “Wonder Woman: The Trial of Diana Prince” is in the works. The preview images are already worrying me. There’s Di in Themiscyra, in chains surrounded by an unhappy mob. As an upside, there’s an image of a re-fattened tough looking Etta Candy, so hope springs eternal.

Strife is for Bad Guys, Diana Brings Hope– Diana’s picture so far may sound too rosy. That’s why consistently good foils must be delivered to give the schism. Great conflict that challenges her mind and ethics is what we need to see. Problem solving when her peers go up against foes like Luthor, the Joker, and such show how our heroes can’t just bump them off. They have to think on their toes, and often face their demons. That’s epic-making stuff.

Keep it DCU, Just Don’t Lose the Flavor– Acknowledge the nature of the super-hero, once again. In the DCU, it’s largely sci-fi, tech, and future driven. Take my earlier statement about peer analogies with the recognition that she doesn’t have to be a distaff version of any. The mission and the mindset of the character sets her apart in application, so her identity isn’t lost. Also, don’t let lazy-assed writers make her ‘Superman-Woman’. All that super-strength and flying make her fall into the category too easily. Writers in the past have alluded to her being able to communicate with animal life, exhibit a hypnotic direct eye-gase that’s impossible to resist, etc. Capitalize more on other skills.

Go to the Source, Not the Median– This is a re-iteration. Keep the original concept relevant as the propellor of the platform. Stop drawing the boundary at Perez. This has stunted the growth for too long. I think his work is great, but it’s not the only great. Look at what’s in between, and what came first. Batman and Superman have had amazing updates at the same time that Perez did his thing. Yet, I love Geoff Johns’ Superman take as well, and all of the above are directly related to the first origin telling. With WW, some was there, but a lot wasn’t. Some of that was fundamental to the character at large, just not the Perez version. Look at it as one solid chunk, and then cull the good stuff.

Lastly, If You Hire a Great Artist, Let Him/Her Do the Job– Let creative, again, be creative. Trust the appointee to come up with the look, or choose the look that suits their style. Why not multiple looks? If they’re succinct with the character, they should be recognizable to the approacher. Simpler artists, once more, make better designers that any other sketcher can pick up and follow with minimum distortion.

ONE LAST THOUGHT: VOTE!

If you are dissatisfied as a consumer (and from what I’m reading/seeing many of you are), don’t just abort, WRITE. You as a buyer are a commodity and a voter. Fire off an email with a clear subject line. It just might get read, and if enough folks do it, a change might occur. Grousing with the peanut gallery can only do so much good.

email DC Comics

email Warner Brothers Entertainment, DC Division

Get on it, and get involved. Peace. SAVE WONDER WOMAN!

    

AND FOR HERA’S SAKE- PLEASE COMMENT. I LOVE FEEDBACK AND DISCUSSION!

Related articles

Save the Super-Heroines! Comic Book Fashion vs. Fad: Lasting Statements Vs Losing Looks

I have strong opinions about women in comics. Sad fact is, in a male dominated field, they are often misrepresented, marginalized, misunderstood, and objectified in a completely erroneous manner that stunts their growth. I want them to be done right, and then be successful. Success brings them to greater platforms like TV and films, and that’s a barren field for the ladies right now. Some might think me sexist for saying this, but if a super-heroine doesn’t have fashion, she’s probably not going to have much of a career. I don’t care if that sounds sexist. I’m calling it as I see it, and I can back it up. More important is to understand the difference in fashion and fad. The goal of both major comic companies now is to get newbies on board, and if the character on the cover doesn’t tell them what they’re about, and give them a window to who they are, why would they care? Super fashion has to tell a story. It also has to suit the activity of the character. Too many details and too much busy-ness can be the death knell of a career, no matter how well written they might be. I’m going to be really brutal to DC in particular, because they NEED it and deserve it the most. Their dwindling sales are the writing on the wall, and I’m sorry, but Jim Lee was the most poorly thought-through choice ever for modifying the looks of the characters, in particular the women. I can make a case for that, too. Marvel has success lately, and I guarantee you, fashion HAS played a part in it. DC is leaning on fad. Art that’s fad doesn’t last; it never does. Everything about the predominant DCU at this point is visually myopic. All flash, and no class.

#1Here’s Carol Danvers, Captain Marvel. Note the fact that the costume is succinct in its defining of the character. “Superhero. Sci-Fi. Military.” Also, it can easily bleed to other media, like film, with no need to be over-tweeked. Jamie McKelvie, using his simple and elegant style has composed a visual that any halfway decent artist can render with minimal difficulty. It’s visually quick and is fashion over fad, with clean lines, and no excess. The consequence of this wise choice?

2

THIS. Not just one, but hundreds of them. They call themselves the “Carol Corps” and just guess who they are? The golden bough of readers- new and FEMALE. One look at the title, and it’s clear what it is about and they’re buying in. It’s luring, and makes an intimidated new reader feel ready. It lays out a visual welcome mat, and then the writing delivers. At a con recently, apparently the room flowed to a standing room only crowd, ready to talk Captain Marvel love. Also note how seamlessly the visual translates into the real world. Kudos.

3Catwoman. Darwyn Cooke made the same thing happen with this character. One glance, and you get “Cat. Sultry. Stealthy.” It supports fashion AND function for the character, and again, you already know enough about the lady from seeing it to open the book and feel invited, without the arrogant assumption that you know her. The zipper ring is a great touch, and gives it pop without overwhelming the look. Purrrr-fect. Sad thing is, this was in place when the Catwoman film with Halle Barry came along. Yes, the plot was wretched, but one look at the trashy, busy, and ugly costume they came up with was enough to keep me away from the theater. Extra galling is how easily this look could’ve been adapted.

wwpgPower Girl. “Tough. Superhero. Unashamed.” I’ve seen articles where some feminists have bashed it, calling it a ‘boob window’, and sought that it be changed (which has been tried three times in the past and failed). The correct term is a cut-out and it’s a longstanding fashion element. I find it catty, and I don’t that it assumes that anyone who likes it is sexist. I’m not, not at all. I think women should make choices that are true to themselves and NOT to accommodate the projections of others. I’ve had it argued that it’s still risque, siting other visual examples. That’s the choice of the artist. Many choose to decide to amplify the bust factor. The fault is not that of Wally Wood, the designer. Do some guys drool over it? Sure. That doesn’t make it wrong. Further, it’s live-action ready. Powerful, defensible, and classic.

powerboyHONORARY MENTION: Power Boy. I’d be incomplete without addressing him real quick after the last one. His look sums him up too. “Narcissist. Bit of a Douche. Powerhouse.” The outfit is actually not half bad for super-hero fashion. This guy got cut the hell in half in less than a year. He was obviously made just to make a statement about “himbos”, but honestly I think he could’ve helmed a title. I’m serious, I’d love a well done comic about a quasi-hero who’s the butt of the joke. He’s even New Gods connected. Plus, he could chew up some screen scenery without a doubt. Hey, why not?

sg

Saturn Girl. Love the character, love the mod, go-go-esque costume. Do not love the character in the costume. When she rose from being pretty much a cypher, we learned that she was a caring, warm, humble, and self-sacrificing woman. She’s also the Sue Storm of the Legion, as a founder, mother, and wife. It’s too flashy and risque for her. Her character would go for something more modest, and it only says “Saturn” to me, and doesn’t denote her heroic nature. Of course, it didn’t last a full decade (it made a slight latter day return, but when the Legion comes back-and it will- I bet it won’t be there).

6Barbara Gordon, Batgirl. A case study in the importance of good fashion for the superhero women. First rendered here by the late Carmine Infantino. What does it say to me? “Look it’s Batgirl, see it’s Batgirl, no really it’s Batgirl.” I get it Carmine. The ears, the cape, the chest emblem, the emblem on the weapons bag (which I like, BTW), the belt buckle, the boots and the gloves tipped me off. All of the visual pyrotechnics are unnecessary and gaudy. The shape of the mask is jagged, and makes her look needlessly hard. Infantino was so-so with design, but he came up with the classic Black Canary look, so he gets a partial pass.

7Hey there Miss Yvonne! Now, we’re talking. The mask points are made rounder and softer, and it makes her face look more open. The gloves and boots match the cowl, and the gaudiness subsides. This is how it had to be tweeked for the TV Set. Vrooooom!

8

Back in four- color land, Don Heck comes along and gives this cluster-f*ck just what it was missing. A starched collar. Robin had one too, but this is not Robin-Girl. It makes her look like a businesswoman. The grey shading starts to creep and take over. Just plain fuggly.

bgWhere do you go from there? Hey, let’s make it sweatsuit grey and yellow and make those ears bigger than half her head, so there’s nary a trace of softness left. In the ‘70s, women like her were visually desexualized to the point that they looked like men with breasts. Bat-astrophe. In the ‘80s, there’s so much indifference about this character she’s pretty much invisible. In Crisis on Infinite Earths, she’s relegated to being a silly joke, to no outcry. Batgirl drops out in 1986, with the Crisis, then we all know what happened to Barbara next, thanks to a gunshot from the Joker. Batgirl was gone, and unfortunately most folks didn’t really care.

timmbgBATGIRL BEGINS! Now THAT’S more like it. Over in TV land, 6 years after she hung up her cowl in the comics, along comes Bruce Timm, a gifted cartoonist. Saints be praised. The ‘over-batting’ is gone. Just one emblem, and thanks to the addition of the matching cape, boots, cowl and gloves, the yellow ugh factor now makes the chest emblem pop. The mask is rounded down a’la “Batman ’66”, AND she now looks her age. The character comes over to the comic based on The Animated Series, to great response, even garnering a very successful oversized one shot. Character interest escalates beyond what it ever was before. DC responds in the mainstream universe with Batgirl flashbacks galore, including her own mini-series.

Batgirl_tnbaWanna make it even cooler? Kill the grey, and now she doesn’t look like a wannabe juniorette Batman. She’s got her own thing going on. The black allows the yellow to come back and it fits perfectly. The two-tone cape is lovely. This is the blueprint for the “Batgirl: Year One” classic, which is a total hit with the fans (I’ll be damned if in the last issue, the big old buckle and bat-shaped boots don’t come back. Sigh.).

timmhuntressThe Huntress. Stepping away from Babs for a sec, to illustrate the notion of fad and bad design. Here’s Bruce Timm doing an ill-fated Jim Lee look for the character. It’s top-heavy for one thing, and makes her face look jagged and unnecessarily harsh. It’s a sad, lukewarm S&M look. The open spaces make the character appear to be a narcissist, and that’s not the case at all. Also, I find it HIGHLY offensive that her crucifix, which was worn around her neck and emphasized that she was a Catholic which made sense as (in this canon) she was from an Italian mafia family, is now an accessory for such a cheap whorish look. Her personality is completely defied, and the uncovered body parts leave her, very obviously, open to attack. In TV or cinema, this would be nothing but sex farce. If Bruce T. can’t make it look good, you’re screwed. Sick, sexist, and ugly. FAIL EXPONENTIAL.

13Cassandra Cain, Batgirl. So, DC realizes that folks now love Batgirl like they never did before. Babs is in a wheelchair, thanks to Mr.J, and is vital in other books. Their solution is a new character. The costume is bad-assed, but the youthful feminine charm is lost. The costume DOES say who she is, but it’s definitely reflective of the 90s, and not suited for the long haul. Slim chance for other mediums with this one. Cassie hangs out for a few years, and dies off from an apparent lack of interest.

14Then, there’s Stephanie Brown, the next Batgirl. Let’s try this thing again. Too much of a too much. It’s not sleek and well lined. All of that padding is so unnecessary. Too bad, because the character inside is actually fun and great and bogged down by the minutiae.

15Kate Kane, Batwoman. Hey, let’s just put another sassy redhead in a Bat-suit, so we can meet everybody half way. Good idea. The red and black is amazing, and it says “Bat. Badass. Woman.” Ready for ‘toons, or even the big screen. ‘Nuff said.

Batgirl_Thrillkiller_01Meanwhile, over in Elseworlds, Thrillkiller Batgirl. Hot, but not a good idea in a knife fight. A- for fashion, B- for function (the lack of cape does make it a little more sensible than the rest of the gang), and a full scholarship for fanboy horniness. This version’s personality is a reckless, sensual wild card, so it actually does make sense.

17Babs comes back again, in the New 52. The costume is back and it’s still pretty fussy (it had bolts on the chest in the first issue). It started out insanely busy, and I’m willing to bet it will ebb off more as time passes. It’s a step in the right direction with the annoying bat-belt being more subdued and not visually outweighing the emblem. The whole desire for her return would be impossible if not for the Bruce Timm contribution.

18A lady with a lot of looks is Zatanna. The classic take. One look- “Magician. Female. Charming.” Yee-up.

zcropThen, she becomes a real super-heroine. No bemoaning of the boob-window that I ever heard. Pretty simple, sorta blah (grey is just hard to pull off in four color land, it requires something to give it punch), but it does say “Sorceress. Super-heroine. Sexy.” Makes it about 5 years.

perezatannaThen, came Perez. Good artist, a lacking designer usually, and was the go-to revamp guy for the company in the Eighties. A lobster on her head (?), the next use of that starchy collar (which is fine on a traditional magician costume), and those big ol’ Z earrings are pretty dreadful. This is also a strong example of busy artists making busy costumes. Only they can even halfway render them. Other artists strengths and weaknesses have to be considered. The Captain Marvel, Timm Batgirl costume, and even the Power Girl costumes are hard for the lamest of talents to screw up. Not ready for prime time, at all. Again, didn’t survive a decade, and the character pretty much vanished for a few years. Where’s her big comeback? The Animated Series, once again, and back to the classic look. Soon after, she started up all over the place and in flashbacks with the League, this outfit gets ret-conned out. Her own series comes shortly thereafter.

21New 52, and damned if I don’t actually kinda love it. The hair especially. It takes the best elements from the previous looks, and incorporates them beautifully. High crimefighter fashion. “Super-heroine. Magician. Confident.” They got it right, here. It can cross media lines of all stripes. I guarantee that if DC doesn’t fold, this could last for decades.

wwtimmWonder Woman. Arguably, the most controversial costume of the lot. Loudly says “American. Princess. Outdated.” Nostalgia is fine, but objectively it’s not very good, and it’s pretty silly. Here we are again with Timm, and it’s still just a lame bikini. How do you update an multi-media icon and leave her recognizable??

wwnfSimple, you hire an artist like Darwyn Cooke, again a cartoonist, who barely tweeks it and you get “Strong. Proud. Anachronistic Warrior.” Simple and here again, a cartoon based artist who using classic style makes a design that can be followed, and used in any media. *slow clap*

new52wwSo, what do we get instead? We almost got freakin’ KNEE PADS. Seriously. What we ended up with is an outfit with a washed out and blah color scheme, a needless arm band that has no function and is redundant with the emblem- which on the camisole is reduced to bling, and a suit that’s overall message is ‘stars’. It arrogantly assumes that the approacher knows who the character is, it makes no sense as an armor, and those little lines on the red of the torso are subject to the artist who gets stuck with them. It’s obvious in the context that it’s not Cliff Chaing’s work, as his offerings are more spacious and spartan, so it conflicts with it’s environs. All that detailed business would look silly in live action. This is why detail driven and over-drawing artists fail at designing. Again, cartoonists and classic stylists know how to make threads that are universally renderable and convey the essence of the characters that wear the designs.

25Good ol’ Raven. I rag on George, but he did this right. “Mystical. Bird-themed. Not a hand-to-hand combatant.” The big circles would be the detractor in ‘real life’, but it still gets a pass. Right on the money, Sir Perez.

26OK, so the sprite here is what kids are being sold on the hugely popular “Teen Titans GO!” series on Cartoon Network. The other is the new-look Raven from DC. Ok, not only is it mo-fuggly, but just how would they expect a kid to graduate from beloved cartoon characters to this unrecognizable mess?? It’s so faddy, it hurts. Needlessly horrific, is what it is. It takes a mysterious but feminine character and evolves her into a monster. Sick and stupid. Total fail. No new reader, especially a female or a child of any gender, is going to be drawn in by this. It will not last to see the dawn of 2016, I’d bet you good money.

What needs to happen? DC needs to look at PRESENT DAY Marvel, and where the quantifiable successes are. Marvel’s taking home the lion’s share, and with lots of good reasons. Understand, I love DC. It’s what I cut my teeth on. I do not, however, think they are making sound choices now. These examples are a statement about the culture that’s dominating (and failing) right now. DC is the classic company, the pioneer. Yet, they seem to be adhering themselves visually to the busy, over-drawn, needlessly exaggerated style of the 1990s that was very much a Marvel ideology at that time. It didn’t last because it was a total fad. People got burned out and abandoned it. Fashion is art, and art is what lasts, when it sees itself as fashion. The lesson? Hire simple, cartoon based designers when you want a product that will endure, and allow the character to prosper. Save the Super-Heroines!

PLEASE LEAVE ANY FEEDBACK/COMMENTS/DISCUSSION POINTS YOU MIGHT HAVE. I LOVE TO CHAT.

 THIS JUST IN: AUGUST 26, 2013-

 http://treblemirinlens.tumblr.com/post/59434815917/captain-marvel-stole-the-spotlight-on-the-cover-of